Thursday, 26 February 2026

Aesthetics Beyond Beauty: The Indian Perspective

 “In Aesthetic experience, the spectator transcends his personal self.” - Abhinavgupta

This blog is a part of thinking activity on Indian Poetics assigned by Dr. and Prof. Dilip Barad sir and the lectures on this topic were conducted and deeply enhanced by Dr. and Prof. Vinod Joshi sir which made my knowledge on the Indian Aesthetic Theory much better. Here I will ponder my understanding and stance on this concept. First I will mention about what I have been taught then later on my views and interpretation is mentioned.

HERE IS A VIDEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION OF MY BLOG-


1. Language, Literature, and Aesthetic Experience

Language and literature are deeply interconnected. Language is often defined as an arbitrary vocal symbol system used for communication. Writing is merely its script; it is not language itself. Pronunciation, lifestyle, and culture shape linguistic expression.

Sound precedes structured language. Before formal communication, there is sound nature itself supports sound in music and rhythm in dance. Thus, art emerges from primordial experience before it becomes linguistic.

Language gives names to impressions. Without language, interpretation becomes difficult; however, not all experience depends on language. Certain forms of pain, joy, or aesthetic feeling can exist beyond words.

Literature, therefore, is not merely linguistic construction but it is a philosophical and psychological phenomenon. At its core, literature seeks aesthetic delight.

2. Western vs Indian Poetics: Process and Result

A key distinction:

  • Western poetics (largely) emphasizes the result — the final structure, plot, or catharsis (e.g., Aristotle).
  • Indian poetics emphasizes the process — how aesthetic experience (Rasa) is generated.

In Western tradition:

  • Aristotle speaks of catharsis — purification of pity and fear.
  • Plato questions imitation and dramatic conflict.

In Indian thought:

  • Focus is on how emotion transforms into aesthetic relish (Rasa).
  • Interpretation is endless; meaning is not fixed.
  • Literature ends in a beginning — aesthetic experience renews itself.

3. Bharata and the Foundation of Rasa Theory

  • Around 200 BCE–200 CE (traditionally dated earlier), Bharata Muni composed the Natyashastra (36 chapters).
  • In the sixth chapter, he introduces Rasa theory.

The Rasa Sutra:

  • Vibhava–Anubhava–Vyabhichari Bhava–Sanyogat Rasa Nishpatti

Meaning:

  1. Vibhava – Determinants (cause of emotion)
  2. Anubhava – Consequent physical expressions
  3. Vyabhichari (Sanchari) Bhava – Transitory emotions
  4. Sthayi Bhava – Permanent emotion

  • Their combination produces Rasa.

Sthayi and Sanchari Bhava

  • Sthayi Bhava – Stable, permanent emotional dispositions
  • Sanchari Bhava – Temporary, supporting emotions

The Nine Rasas

  1. Shringara (Love)
  2. Hasya (Comic)
  3. Karuna (Compassion)
  4. Raudra (Anger)
  5. Veera (Heroic)
  6. Bhayanaka (Fear)
  7. Bibhatsa (Disgust)
  8. Adbhuta (Wonder)
  9. Shanta (Peace)

  • Rasa is not ordinary happiness. It is aesthetic bliss, it can be named but not fully dissected. It is felt, not materially seen.

4. Drama as the Pure Form of Art

  • Indian aesthetics often considers drama the most complete art form.

eg- Abhigyan shakuntalam by Kalidasa

demonstrates the harmonious blending (oath-proth) of rasas.

In drama:

  • Components may mix (combination)
  • Some elements become inseparable (organic unity / sajivisha)

5. Early Critics of Bharata

1. Bhatt Lollata – Utpattivada

  • Rasa is produced by actors (Nat and Nati).
  • Rasa does not pre-exist; it is generated in performance.

2. Shankuka

  • Rasa exists through inference.
  • Audience perceives it through:
  1. Sadrishya (semblance)
  2. Sanshaya (doubt)
  3. Mithya Pratiti (false cognition)
  4. Samyag Pratiti (correct cognition)

Example: Chitra-Turaga (painted horse) — appears real but isn’t.


3. Bhattanayaka

Introduced:

Sadharanikarana (universalization)

  • Rasa becomes universal, not personal.
  • Writer → Performer → Audience chain (similar to Plato’s Ion concept later improved by Aristotle)

4. Abhinavagupta


  • Abhinavagupta synthesized all theories.
  • He defined Rasa as:
  1. A manifestation of blissful consciousness (Prakasha-Ananda).
  2. Rasa is self-revealing and transcendent.

6. Dhvani Theory – The Soul of Poetry

  • Anandavardhana in Dhvanyaloka declared:

“Dhvani is the soul of poetry.”

  • Dhvani = Suggestion beyond literal meaning.

Three Powers of Words

  1. Abhidha – Literal meaning
  2. Lakshana – Indirect meaning
  3. Vyanjana – Suggestive meaning (highest)

  • Dhvani operates through Vyanjana.

Types of Dhvani:

  1. Vastu Dhvani (idea)
  2. Alankara Dhvani (figure)
  3. Rasa Dhvani (highest)

  • Laukika (worldly) vs Alaukika (aesthetic, transcendental)

7. Vakrokti – Oblique Expression

  • Kuntaka in Vakroktijivita proposed:
  • Beauty lies in deviation or obliqueness.

Vakrokti = stylistic twist that creates charm.

8. Alankara – Ornamentation

  • Mammata in Kavyaprakasha explains:
  • Alankara enhances beauty but should not be visibly forced.

Two types:

  1. Shabda Alankara (sound-based)
  2. Artha Alankara (meaning-based)

  • Ornament is supportive, not primary.

9. Riti – Style as the Soul of Poetry

  • Vamana declared:

“Riti is the soul of poetry.”

Major styles:

  1. Vaidarbhi – Elegant (associated with Kalidasa)
  2. Gaudi – Ornate (associated with Dandin)
  3. Panchali – Mixed style
  4. Lati – Linked with western Indian regions (less documented but mentioned in later discussions)

  • Style forms literary identity.

10. Auchitya – Propriety

  • Kshemendra introduced Auchitya (propriety).
  • Everything in poetry must be appropriate:

  1. Character
  2. Situation
  3. Emotion
  4. Language 

  • Without propriety, rasa collapses.

11. Experience, Philosophy, and Eternal Feeling

  • Literature:
  • Contains Anubhava (experience)
  • Connects with psychology and philosophy
  • Transforms personal emotion into universal experience
  • Happiness and satisfaction differ.
  • Rasa is aesthetic bliss — not ordinary pleasure.
  • Astonishment (Adbhuta) may end, but aesthetic wonder can be endless.
  • Smriti (memory), Swapna (dream), Kalpana (imagination) — these shape artistic creation.


Conclusion

  • Indian poetics is a systematic aesthetic philosophy that:
  • Moves from sound to language to meaning.
  • Emphasizes process over product.
  • Treats literature as a philosophical experience.
  • Sees art as a vehicle for transcendental bliss.
  • Rasa is not dissected — it is realized.
  • Dhvani is not stated — it is suggested.
  • Vakrokti is not straight — it is creatively turned.
  • Riti is identity.
  • Alankara is ornament.
  • Auchitya is balance.
  • Thus, Indian aesthetics seeks not merely beauty, but the inner source of aesthetic bliss.

The difference between Indian Aesthetics and Indian Poetics.


  • Indian aesthetics and Indian poetics are closely related but differ in their scope and focus. Indian aesthetics is the broader philosophical study of beauty, artistic experience, and emotional response in all forms of art, including literature, music, dance, and drama. It explores how art produces aesthetic pleasure (Rasa) and how human consciousness experiences artistic bliss. It is deeply connected with philosophy and psychology, emphasizing the universal and transcendental nature of aesthetic experience. Indian poetics, on the other hand, is a more specialized branch that focuses specifically on literature and the principles governing poetic composition and interpretation. It examines the structure, language, style, and meaning of poetry through theories such as Rasa (emotion), Dhvani (suggestion), Vakrokti (oblique expression), Riti (style), Alankara (figures of speech), and Auchitya (propriety). While Indian aesthetics deals with the overall philosophy of art and aesthetic experience, Indian poetics provides the technical and theoretical framework to analyze and understand literary works. In simple terms, Indian aesthetics explains why and how art creates aesthetic pleasure, whereas Indian poetics explains how literature achieves that effect through linguistic and structural devices.

MY UNDERSTANDING AND FURTHER THOUGHTS-

Indian Aesthetics and Poetics: From Sanskrit Drama to Bhakti Literature

The Origin of Indian Aesthetics in Sanskrit Drama and the Natyashastra

  • Indian aesthetics and poetics find their earliest systematic expression in Sanskrit drama, particularly through Bharata Muni’s Natyashastra, composed approximately between the 2nd century BCE and 2nd century CE. This foundational treatise is not merely a manual for playwrights but a complete theory of art, performance, and aesthetic experience. The term Natya itself means “to act,” and Bharata describes drama as the imitation of life and emotions from the three worlds—divine, human, and cosmic. The primary aim of drama, according to Bharata, is not only entertainment but also to provide relief to the tired, comfort to the grieving, and intellectual and spiritual elevation to the audience. Drama was thus conceived as a unification of all art forms, combining literature, music, dance, gesture, costume, and philosophy.
  • The Natyashastra is an extensive work covering all aspects of theatrical production, including stage design (mandapa), acting techniques, costume and makeup, music, dance, and audience reception. It also introduces the famous theory of Rasa, which explains how aesthetic experience is created and perceived. Bharata outlines four types of acting (Abhinaya): Angika (body movements), Vachika (speech), Aharya (costume and makeup), and Satvika (inner emotional expression). Among these, Satvika Abhinaya is considered the most important because it conveys genuine emotional states, allowing the audience to experience aesthetic bliss.

Characteristics and Structure of Sanskrit Drama

  • Sanskrit drama developed unique characteristics that distinguish it from Western drama. One important principle was that plays should not end in tragedy. Even if suffering occurred during the narrative, the conclusion restored harmony and emotional balance, often culminating in Shanta Rasa (peace). Sanskrit drama was also a mixture of prose and poetry, demonstrating both artistic beauty and emotional intensity.
  • The use of language in Sanskrit drama reflected social hierarchy. Kings, Brahmins, and noble characters spoke Sanskrit, while women, servants, and lower-class characters spoke Prakrit, the language of the common people. This linguistic diversity created realism and social representation within the dramatic framework. Furthermore, violent or intimate physical actions such as death, eating, biting, kissing, or sleeping were not shown on stage but conveyed indirectly through suggestion. This reflects the Indian aesthetic emphasis on suggestion rather than explicit representation.
  • Thematically, Sanskrit dramas often drew from already known mythological or historical stories, which were modified creatively by playwrights. Love was the central theme in most plays, particularly romantic love between the Nayaka (hero) and Nayika (heroine). Other important characters included the Vidushaka, the comic companion who provided humor and social satire, and the Sutradhara, the stage manager who introduced the play and guided the narrative.

Scenic Representation in Kalidasa’s Abhijnanasakuntalam

  • Kalidasa’s Abhijnanasakuntalam provides an excellent scenic example of Sanskrit dramatic aesthetics. In the opening act, King Dushyanta enters a forest while hunting but becomes captivated by the serene beauty of nature and encounters Shakuntala in the hermitage. The peaceful environment, filled with trees, rivers, and birds, reflects Shanta Rasa and establishes harmony between human emotion and nature. Their gradual falling in love exemplifies Shringara Rasa, the rasa of love.
  • Nature plays an active emotional role in the drama. When Shakuntala is later separated from Dushyanta, even the forest appears sorrowful, reflecting Karuna Rasa (compassion). Importantly, although the play contains suffering and separation, it does not end in tragedy. Instead, it concludes with reunion and restoration, fulfilling Bharata’s principle that drama should ultimately bring emotional resolution and peace.

The Theory of Rasa: The Foundation of Indian Aesthetics

  • The central concept of Indian aesthetics is Rasa, which literally means “juice,” “essence,” or “flavor.” Rasa refers to the aesthetic experience felt by the audience when witnessing artistic performance. Bharata originally identified eight rasas:
  • Shringara (love), Hasya (laughter), Raudra (anger), Karuna (compassion), Bibhatsa (disgust), Bhayanaka (fear), Veera (heroism), and Adbhuta (wonder). Later, Abhinavagupta added Shanta Rasa (peace) as the ninth and highest rasa. Still later, Vatsalya (parental love) and Bhakti (devotion) were also recognized.
  • Each rasa is associated with specific emotions, colors, and deities, emphasizing the integration of psychology, symbolism, and spirituality in Indian aesthetics. Rasa emerges from the interaction of Vibhava (cause), Anubhava (expression), and Sanchari Bhava (temporary emotions), leading to aesthetic realization.


The Rasas in Indian Aesthetics (with Deity and Color)


  • The Eight Rasas given by Bharata Muni in the Natyashastra.


1) Shringara Rasa (शृंगार रस) – The Rasa of Love, beauty, and sensuality

Sthayi Bhava (emotion): Rati (love)

Presiding Deity: Lord Vishnu

Color: Light Green


2) Hasya Rasa (हास्य रस) – The Rasa of Laughter and Comedy

Sthayi Bhava: Hasa (laughter)

Presiding Deity: Pramatha (attendants of Lord Shiva)

Color: White


3) Raudra Rasa (रौद्र रस) – The Rasa of Anger and Fury

Sthayi Bhava: Krodha (anger)

Presiding Deity: Lord Rudra (Shiva)

Color: Red


4) Karuna Rasa (करुण रस) – The Rasa of Compassion and Sorrow

Sthayi Bhava: Shoka (grief)

Presiding Deity: Lord Yama

Color: Grey


5) Bibhatsa Rasa (बीभत्स रस) – The Rasa of Disgust

Sthayi Bhava: Jugupsa (aversion)

Presiding Deity: Lord Shiva

Color: Blue


6) Bhayanaka Rasa (भयानक रस) – The Rasa of Fear and Terror

Sthayi Bhava: Bhaya (fear)

Presiding Deity: Kala (Time/Death)

Color: Black


7) Veera Rasa (वीर रस) – The Rasa of Heroism and Courage

Sthayi Bhava: Utsaha (enthusiasm, courage)

Presiding Deity: Lord Indra

Color: Golden or Saffron


8) Adbhuta Rasa (अद्भुत रस) – The Rasa of Wonder and Astonishment

Sthayi Bhava: Vismaya (astonishment)

Presiding Deity: Lord Brahma

Color: Yellow


  • The Ninth Rasa added by Abhinavagupta.

9) Shanta Rasa (शान्त रस) – The Rasa of Peace and Tranquility

Sthayi Bhava: Shama (inner peace, detachment)

Presiding Deity: Lord Vishnu

Color: Pure White


  • Later Rasas added in Medieval Aesthetic Traditions 600 years before.

10) Vatsalya Rasa (वत्सल्य रस) – The Rasa of Parental Love and Affection

Sthayi Bhava: Vatsalya (parental affection)

Presiding Deity: Often associated with Yashoda and Krishna (symbolic representation of maternal love)

Color: Pale Yellow or Soft White


11) Bhakti Rasa (भक्ति रस) – The Rasa of Devotion

Sthayi Bhava: Bhakti (devotion)

Presiding Deity: Depends on devotee (Krishna, Rama, Shiva, etc.)

Color: Deep Blue or Saffron



Illustration of Rasa in Mudrarakshasa

  • The Sanskrit political drama Mudrarakshasa, attributed to Vishakhadatta, demonstrates the application of rasa theory in dramatic structure. Unlike romantic dramas, this play focuses on political strategy and power struggles between Chanakya (Kautilya), Chandragupta Maurya, and Rakshasa. The dominant rasas in the play are Veera Rasa (heroism) and Raudra Rasa (anger), reflecting themes of war, political tension, and masculine power.

  • Shringara Rasa is largely absent, emphasizing the seriousness of the narrative. The play ultimately restores political stability, resulting in Shanta Rasa. Different forms of masculinity are represented through characters: Chandragupta represents royal authority, Chanakya represents intellectual and strategic masculinity, and Rakshasa represents loyalty and ethical strength.



Medieval Indian Poetics and the Rise of Bhakti Movement

  • Indian poetics expanded significantly during the medieval period through the Bhakti movement, which emerged between the 5th and 15th centuries. This movement transformed Indian literary and aesthetic traditions by emphasizing personal devotion rather than ritualistic religion. It originated in South India with the Alvars (Vaishnavite saints) and Nayanars (Shaivite saints) and later spread across India.
  • Philosophers such as Adi Shankaracharya contributed to its philosophical framework through Advaita Vedanta, emphasizing unity between the individual soul and ultimate reality. Later figures like Basava in Karnataka established the Veerashaiva or Lingayat movement, which rejected caste hierarchy and emphasized direct devotion to a personal God.
  • The Bhakti movement also marked a major shift in literary language. Instead of Sanskrit, poets began composing in vernacular languages such as Kannada, Marathi, Gujarati, Hindi, and Tamil. This made literature more accessible and emotionally powerful, strengthening the connection between poet and audience.

Vachanas and Veerashaiva Poetics

  • One important poetic form associated with the Bhakti movement is the Vachana, which means “utterance” or “speech.” Vachanas were devotional poems written in simple language, expressing personal spiritual experience. These poems rejected ritualism and emphasized direct emotional connection with God.
  • The Veerashaiva movement, led by Basava, created a space called Anubhava Mantapa, where poets, thinkers, and devotees gathered to discuss spiritual ideas. This environment encouraged democratic literary participation, allowing even women and lower-class individuals to become poets. Akka Mahadevi, one of the most prominent women poets, expressed intense mystical devotion through her vachanas.
  • These poems often used powerful metaphors. For example, Bhakti is compared to a saw that cuts both ways, symbolizing the intense and transformative nature of devotion. Bhakti poetry emphasized personal experience, emotional intensity, and spiritual liberation, making it a crucial development in Indian poetics.
The Geographical and Social Expansion of Bhakti

  • The Bhakti movement spread across India, influencing regions from Tamil Nadu to Gujarat, Maharashtra, and North India. It emphasized vernacular expression, making poetry accessible to common people. Scholars such as George Grierson later identified Bhakti as a pan-Indian cultural movement.
  • Bhakti also functioned as a social force, challenging caste hierarchy and empowering marginalized groups. As modern scholar Christian Novetzke argues, Bhakti was not merely a private religious experience but a public cultural performance that shaped literary and social communities.

Conclusion: Indian Aesthetics as a Unified Vision of Art, Emotion, and Philosophy

  • Indian aesthetics and poetics present a comprehensive understanding of art as an emotional, philosophical, and spiritual experience. Beginning with Bharata’s Natyashastra, Indian aesthetic thought established drama as a complete artistic form capable of expressing universal emotions. Through rasa theory, Indian poetics explained how art produces aesthetic bliss. Later developments, especially during the Bhakti period, expanded literary expression into vernacular languages and emphasized personal emotional experience.
  • Unlike Western poetics, which often focuses on structure and outcome, Indian poetics focuses on emotional process and aesthetic realization. Literature is not merely linguistic expression but a means of experiencing universal truth, emotional transformation, and spiritual awareness. Thus, Indian aesthetics views art not simply as representation, but as a pathway to aesthetic bliss and self-realization.



INDIAN AESTHETICS IN CONTEMPORARY CINEMA AND LITERATURE-



1. Rasa in Modern Indian Fiction
  • Modern Indian novels often operate through dominant rasas, even when they appear realistic or political.
  1. In Train to Pakistan by Khushwant Singh, Karuna Rasa (compassion) and Bhayanaka Rasa (fear) dominate the narrative of Partition. The aesthetic effect is not just historical documentation but an emotional universalization of grief.
  2. The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy blends Karuna (pathos) and Bibhatsa (discomfort/disgust) through fragmented narration. The emotional layering resembles Bharata’s idea of Sanchari Bhavas (transitory emotions) supporting a deeper Sthayi Bhava of sorrow.
  3. Gitanjali by Rabindranath Tagore exemplifies Bhakti Rasa and Shanta Rasa, where devotion transforms into aesthetic tranquility rather than ritualistic religiosity.
  • Even in contemporary English-language Indian fiction, emotion is not raw; it is aestheticized aligning with the Rasa process of universalization.


2. Dhvani (Suggestion) in Indian Writing
  • Indian literature frequently relies on suggestion rather than explicit statement, echoing Anandavardhana’s Dhvani theory.
  1. Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri uses silence, pauses, and unsaid tensions. The emotional meaning emerges through implication rather than direct commentary  a modern manifestation of Vyanjana (suggestive meaning).
  2. Tughlaq by Girish Karnad uses historical narrative suggestively to comment on modern political disillusionment. The literal story and implied meaning operate simultaneously a classical Dhvani structure in a modern political drama.


3. Vakrokti and Stylistic Innovation
  • The idea of Vakrokti (oblique expression) is visible in modern Indian poetry.
  1. A. K. Ramanujan’s poetry employs layered metaphors and cultural irony. Meaning emerges through indirection rather than straightforward declaration.
  2. Nissim Ezekiel uses irony and linguistic deviation, showing how obliqueness creates aesthetic charm very much in the spirit of Kuntaka’s Vakrokti.


Relevance of Indian Aesthetics in Contemporary Indian Cinema

1. Shringara and Karuna in Romantic Drama

Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge is structured around Shringara Rasa (love), supported by Veera Rasa (heroic determination) and concluding in emotional harmony (Shanta-like closure). The famous mustard-field scene aestheticizes love rather than presenting it realistically transforming emotion into rasa.

2. Veera and Raudra in Political/Historical Cinema

Lagaan exemplifies Veera Rasa (heroism), supported by Bhayanaka (fear of colonial power) and culminating in collective triumph. The audience does not merely watch cricket; they experience aestheticized courage.

Similarly, Tanhaji foregrounds Veera and Raudra Rasa through stylized battle sequences, reflecting classical heroic aesthetics.

3. Karuna and Shanta in Realist Cinema

Masaan predominantly evokes Karuna Rasa, yet ends with a sense of quiet emotional resolution resembling Shanta Rasa. Sorrow is not chaotic; it is aestheticized and universalized.

4. Bhakti and Devotional Aesthetics in Cinema

Baahubali: The Beginning integrates Veera, Adbhuta (wonder), and Bhakti-like devotion toward heroic figures. The scale, music, and spectacle produce aesthetic astonishment similar to Adbhuta Rasa.



Contemporary Significance

Indian aesthetics remains relevant today because:

  • Indian storytelling still prioritizes emotional experience over mere realism.
  • Cinema continues to avoid absolute tragedy and often restores equilibrium echoing Sanskrit drama.
  • Suggestion (Dhvani) dominates subtle films and literary fiction.
  • Emotional universalization (Sadharanikarana) explains why audiences deeply relate to stories beyond personal identity.
  • Even in streaming-era narratives, Indian works rarely abandon rasa structure. Emotional layering, stylized performance, music, and symbolic imagery all trace back to classical aesthetic principles.

HERE IS A PPT FOR CLEAR UNDERSTANDING-


References-

Barad, Dilip. “Indian Aesthetics and Indian Poetics.” Dilip Barad | Teacher Blog, 17 Feb. 2026, https://blog.dilipbarad.com/2026/02/indian-aesthetics-and-indian-poetics.html.

Barad, Dilip. “Indian Poetics.” Dilip Barad | Teacher Blog, 18 Feb. 2022,

Baahubali: The Beginning. Directed by S. S. Rajamouli, performances by Prabhas, Rana Daggubati, and Anushka Shetty, Arka Media Works, 2015.

Bharata Muni. Natya Shastra of Bharata Muni with Abhinava Bharati. Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/NatyaShastraOfBharataMuniWithAbhinavaBharatiIMadhsusudanShastri

Bharata Muni. Natyasastra: A Treatise on Hindu Dramaturgy and Histrionics. Translated by Manomohan Ghosh, Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1950. Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/dli.csl.6367

Bharata Muni. The Natyashastra: English Translation with Critical Notes. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, 1996. Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/natyasastraengli0000bhar

Bhagwat, A. K. “G. T. Deshpande and the Theory of Rasa.” Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, vol. 41, 1960. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23329225

Delmonico, Elizabeth Otten. “Rasa in Arun Kolatkar’s Jejuri: An Application of Classical Indian Aesthetics.” Journal of South Asian Literature, vol. 35, no. 2, 2000. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/41178980

Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge. Directed by Aditya Chopra, performances by Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol, Yash Raj Films, 1995.

Ezekiel, Nissim. Collected Poems, 1952–1988. Oxford University Press, 1992. Internet Archive,

Karnad, Girish. Tughlaq. Oxford University Press, 1972. Internet Archive,

Lagaan. Directed by Ashutosh Gowariker, performances by Aamir Khan, Aamir Khan Productions, 2001.

Lahiri, Jhumpa. Interpreter of Maladies. Houghton Mifflin, 1999. Internet Archive,

Masaan. Directed by Neeraj Ghaywan, performances by Vicky Kaushal and Richa Chadha, Phantom Films, 2015.

Masson, Jeffrey Moussaieff. “The Dhvanyaloka and the Dhvanyalokalocana.” Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 97, no. 3, 1977, pp. 279–290. JSTOR,

Mukerjee, Radhakamal. “Rasas as Springs of Art in Indian Aesthetics.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 24, no. 1, 1965, pp. 45–53. JSTOR,

Ramanujan, A. K. Collected Poems. Oxford University Press, 1995. Internet Archive, https://archive.org/search?query=A.+K.+Ramanujan+Collected+Poems

Roy, Arundhati. The God of Small Things. IndiaInk, 1997. Internet Archive,

Sathaye, Adheesh. “The Production of Unpleasurable Rasas.” Journal of Indian Philosophy, vol. 38, no. 4, 2010. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23044957

Singh, Khushwant. Train to Pakistan. Chatto & Windus, 1956. Internet Archive,

Shahane, V. A. “Critical Perspectives on Indian Poetics.” Indian Literature, vol. 28, no. 2, 1985. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40872748

Sharma, Arvind. “Surdas’s Poetry in Light of Abhinavagupta’s Aesthetic Theory.” Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, vol. 62, 1981, pp. 213–222. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40873732

Sivarudrappa, G. S. “Literary Criticism in Indian Poetics.” Indian Literature, vol. 28, no. 2, 1985. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23334030

Subrahmanyam, Padma. Bharatiya Natyashastra, Vol. 1. Internet Archive,

Tagore, Rabindranath. Gitanjali (Song Offerings). Macmillan, 1913. Internet Archive,






-

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

The Heidi Generation: Feminism in Transition

  The Modern Woman’s Dilemma in Wasserstein’s Play Click here for the concept overview of this blog- Wendy Wasserstein’s The Heidi Chronicle...